Hedging Opinion in Romanian Conversational Discourse: The Use of Softeners

This corpus-based paper addresses the use of softeners in Romanian conversational discourse. It highlights two important interactional functions: (i) as devices for mitigating the imposition of face-threatening acts; (ii) as markers of shared knowledge. When they serve the latter function, softeners offer the addressee the opportunity to provide support, understanding, thus showing that both speaker and addressee are on the same wavelength.

Hedging Opinion in Romanian Conversational Discourse: The Use of Softeners.

Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii "Ovidius" Constanţa. Seria Filologie

Volum 1 | Număr 22 | Publicat la 01/09/2011 | ISSN  1223-7248

Autori:
Diana Hornoiu
Rezumat

This corpus-based paper addresses the use of softeners in Romanian conversational discourse. It highlights two important interactional functions: (i) as devices for mitigating the imposition of face-threatening acts; (ii) as markers of shared knowledge. When they serve the latter function, softeners offer the addressee the opportunity to provide support, understanding, thus showing that both speaker and addressee are on the same wavelength.

Cuvinte cheie:
conversation analysis, extreme case formulation, face-threatening act, positive
Materiale adiţionale
  1. Hedging Opinion in Romanian Conversational Discourse: The Use of Softeners

    This corpus-based paper addresses the use of softeners in Romanian conversational discourse. It highlights two important interactional functions: (i) as devices for mitigating the imposition of face-threatening acts; (ii) as markers of shared knowledge. When they serve the latter function, softeners offer the addressee the opportunity to provide support, understanding, thus showing that both speaker and addressee are on the same wavelength.




Evaluarea articolului: