Journal Home Journal Home

Copertă număr curent
  • Revistă: Studii si cercetari filologice. Seria limbi romanice
  • Editură Editura Universitatii din Pitesti
  • Redactor şef Diana-Adriana Lefter
  • ISSN 18433979
  • eISSN
  • Data ultimului număr N/A
  • Data urmatorului număr N/A

Editor de active Editor de active

«Înapoi

Peer Reviewer's Guide/Guide du peer reviewer

 
 

 

Peer-review policy

The rules outlined on this page applies to the whole review practice of the journals.

General information

The following types of contribution to the journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Technical Reports, Analysis, Reviews and Insight articles. All forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors.

Other contributed articles are not usually peer-reviewed. Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors.

For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us.

Questions about a specific manuscript should be directed to the editor who is handling the manuscript.

Online manuscript review

We ask peer-reviewers to submit their reports via SCIPIO.ro online system by following the link provided in the editor's request for review. There is an online help guide to assist in using this system, and a helpdesk email account for any technical problems.

Criteria for publication

The journals receive submissions than they can't publish. To be published in the journal, a paper should meet four general criteria:

  • Provides strong evidence for its conclusions.
  • Novel.
  • Of importance to scientists in the specific field.
  • Ideally, interesting to researchers in other related disciplines.

In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field.

The review process

All submitted manuscripts are read by the editorial staff. To save time for authors and peer-reviewers, only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. Those papers judged by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advice from specialists in the field).

Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities:

  • Accept, with or without editorial revisions
  • Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached
  • Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission
  • Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems

Reviewers are welcome to recommend a particular course of action, but they should bear in mind that the other reviewers of a particular paper may have different technical expertise and/or views, and the editors may have to make a decision based on conflicting advice. The most useful reports, therefore, provide the editors with the information on which a decision should be based. Setting out the arguments for and against publication is often more helpful to the editors than a direct recommendation one way or the other.

Editorial decisions are not a matter of counting votes or numerical rank assessments, and we do not always follow the majority recommendation. We try to evaluate the strength of the arguments raised by each reviewer and by the authors, and we may also consider other information not available to either party. Our primary responsibilities are to our readers and to the scientific community at large, and in deciding how best to serve them, we must weigh the claims of each paper against the many others also under consideration.

We may return to reviewers for further advice, particularly in cases where they disagree with each other, or where the authors believe they have been misunderstood on points of fact. We therefore ask that reviewers should be willing to provide follow-up advice as requested. We are very aware, however, that reviewers are usually reluctant to be drawn into prolonged disputes, so we try to keep consultation to the minimum we judge necessary to provide a fair hearing for the authors.

When reviewers agree to assess a paper, we consider this a commitment to review subsequent revisions. However, editors will not send a resubmitted paper back to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address the criticisms.

We take reviewers' criticisms seriously; in particular, we are very reluctant to disregard technical criticisms. In cases where one reviewer alone opposes publication, we may consult the other reviewers as to whether s/he is applying an unduly critical standard. We occasionally bring in additional reviewers to resolve disputes, but we prefer to avoid doing so unless there is a specific issue, for example a specialist technical point, on which we feel a need for further advice.

Selecting peer-reviewers

Reviewer selection is critical to the publication process, and we base our choice on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations and our own previous experience of a reviewer's characteristics. For instance, we avoid using people who are slow, careless, or do not provide reasoning for their views, whether harsh or lenient.

We check with potential reviewers before sending them manuscripts to review. Reviewers should bear in mind that these messages contain confidential information, which should be treated as such.

Timing

The journal is committed to rapid editorial decisions and publication, and we believe that an efficient editorial process is a valuable service both to our authors and to the scientific community as a whole. We therefore ask reviewers to respond promptly within the number of days agreed. If reviewers anticipate a longer delay than previously expected, we ask them to let us know so that we can keep the authors informed and, where necessary, find alternatives.

Anonymity

We do not release reviewers' identities to authors or to other reviewers, except when reviewers specifically ask to be identified. Unless they feel strongly, however, we prefer that reviewers should remain anonymous throughout the review process and beyond.

We ask reviewers not to identify themselves to authors without the editor's knowledge. If they wish to reveal their identities while the manuscript is under consideration, this should be done via the editor, or if this is not practicable, we ask authors to inform the editor as soon as possible after the reviewer has revealed his or her identity to the author.

We deplore any attempt by authors to confront reviewers or determine their identities. Our own policy is to neither confirm nor deny any speculation about reviewers' identities, and we encourage reviewers to adopt a similar policy.

Editing referees' reports

As a matter of policy, we do not suppress reviewers' reports; any comments that were intended for the authors are transmitted, regardless of what we may think of the content. On rare occasions, we may edit a report to remove offensive language or comments that reveal confidential information about other matters. We ask reviewers to avoid statements that may cause needless offence; conversely, we strongly encourage reviewers to state plainly their opinion of a paper. Authors should recognize that criticisms are not necessarily unfair simply because they are expressed in robust language.

Peer-review publication policies

All contributions submitted to journal that are selected for peer-review are sent to at least one, but usually two or more, independent reviewers, selected by the editors. Authors are welcome to suggest suitable independent reviewers and may also request that the journal excludes one or two individuals or laboratories. The journal sympathetically considers such requests and usually honours them, but the editor's decision on the choice of referees is final.

As a condition of agreeing to assess the manuscript, all reviewers undertake to keep submitted manuscripts and associated data confidential, and not to redistribute them without permission from the journal. If a reviewer seeks advice from colleagues while assessing a manuscript, he or she ensures that confidentiality is maintained and that the names of any such colleagues are provided to the journal with the final report. By this and by other means, the journal endeavour to keep the content of all submissions confidential until the publication date other than in the specific case of its embargoed press release available to registered journalists. Although we go to every effort to ensure reviewers honour their promise to ensure confidentiality, we are not responsible for the conduct of reviewers.

Ethics and security

The journal editor may seek advice about submitted papers not only from technical reviewers but also on any aspect of a paper that raises concerns. These may include, for example, ethical issues or issues of data or materials access. Very occasionally, concerns may also relate to the implications to society of publishing a paper, including threats to security. In such circumstances, advice will usually be sought simultaneously with the technical peer-review process. As in all publishing decisions, the ultimate decision whether to publish is the responsibility of the editor of the journal concerned.

 

Politique éditoriale
 
La revue «Studii si cercetari filologice. Seria limbi romanice » (« Etudes et recherches en philologie. Série langues romanes ») accueille des travaux originaux dans le domaine des études littéraires et linguistiques, en français, espagnol, portugais, italien et catalan. Notre revue ne publie que des textes qui n'ont pas été publiés précédemment dans d'autres revues, volumes collectifs, actes des congrès, etc. Par la soumission du texte, l'auteur certifie l'originalité et la paternité du texte et est d'accord à ne pas le soumettre à une autre publication avant la réponse d'acceptabilité de la part du comité scientifique et des réviseurs de notre revue.
Le processus de sélection des textes est aveugle et peer-review, assuré par les membres du comité scientifique et par les réviseurs. L'auteur voulant publier son article dans la revue «Studii si cercetari filologice. Seria limbi romanice » soumet un exemplaire électronique à la rédaction de la revue, laquelle envoie le texte, anonymé, à deux réviseurs ou membres du comité scientifique. Ces derniers donnent leur avis et recommandent, le cas échéant, la révision du texte par son auteur, de sorte à le faire correspondre aux standards scientifiques de la revue.
Dans l'évaluation des textes, les réviseurs ont en vue les paramètres suivants :
1. l'originalité du texte et de la démarche ;
2. l'adéquation à la thématique de la revue ;
3. le rapport du texte avec l'état actuel de la recherche scientifique dans le domaine ;
4. la rigueur scientifique et l'étique de la recherche ;
5. le niveau d'expression.
Chaque paramètre est noté sur une échelle de 0 – 10, de sorte que le maximum de points qu'un texte puisse obtenir est de 50 points. Pour qu'un texte soit accepté pour publication dans la revue «Studii si cercetari filologice. Seria limbi romanice » , il doit obtenir au moins 40 points, la moyenne entre les deux évaluations. Si l'on constate une différence supérieure à 10 points entre les évaluations des deux réviseurs, le président du comité scientifique est appelé à évaluer lui-aussi le texte.
Les évaluations des réviseurs sont envoyées à la rédaction de la revue, laquelle envoie aux auteurs deux types de documents : le texte initial avec les suggestions et les mentions des réviseurs et les « feuilles d'évaluation », anonymées, comprenant les paramètres ci-dessus, avec les commentaires des réviseurs.
Après la réponse de la rédaction de la revue «Studii si cercetari filologice. Seria limbi romanice », l'auteur dont le texte a été retenu est tenu à renvoyer le texte, révisé selon les indications et dans la mise en page demandée, dans 10 jours au plus tard.      

 

Rezumat Rezumat

 
 

Index des auteurs
 
Numéro 1/2007
 
Adriana-Silvia Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Laura-Elena Cîtu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Florinela Comanescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Corina-Amelia Georgescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Yvonne Goga
Université « Babes-Bolyai » Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie
Liliana Goilan-Sandu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Cristina Ilinca
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Mirela Ivan
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Mihaela Mitu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Carmen Onel
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Gabriel Parvan
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Vasile Radulescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina-Madgalena Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Université « Spiru Haret », Bucarest, Roumanie

Numéro 2/2007
 
Adriana-Silvia Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
António Bárbolo Alves
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Centro de Estudos António Maria Mourinho, Portugal
Francis Claudon
Université Paris XII-Val de Marne, France                         
Catalina Constantinescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Corina-Amelia Georgescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Yvonne Goga
Université « Babes-Bolyai » Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie
Cristina Ilinca
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Andrei Ionescu
Université de Bucarest, Roumanie
Mirela Ivan
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Joan Llinàs Suau
Université de Bucarest, Roumanie, Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Claude Muller
Université de Bordeaux & CNRS, France
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Carmen Onel
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Vasile Radulescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Eugen Simion
Académie Roumanie, Institut "George C?linescu", Roumanie
Ana-Marina Tomescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina-Madgalena Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Université « Spiru Haret », Bucarest, Roumanie

Numéro 3/2008
Irina Aldea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Adriana-Silvia Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Ina-Alexandra Ciodaru
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Florinela Comanescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Anca Dragomir
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Cristina Ilinca
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Carmen Onel
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Vasile Radulescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Liliana Voiculescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina-Madgalena Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Université « Spiru Haret », Bucarest, Roumanie
 

Numéro 4/2008
António Bárbolo Alves
Centro de Estudos António Maria Mourinho, Centro de Estudos em Letras da Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal
Laura-Elena Cîtu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Florinela Comanescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Corina-Amelia Georgescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Yvonne Goga
Université « Babes-Bolyai » Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Madalina Lupu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Mihaela Mitu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Carmen Onel
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Vasile Radulescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Andreea  Vladescu
Université « Spiru Haret », Bucarest, Roumanie
Liliana Voiculescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina-Madgalena Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Université « Spiru Haret », Bucarest, Roumanie
 
Numéro 5/2009
 
Adriana-Silvia Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Florinela Comanescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Catalina Constantinescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Anca Dragomir
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Sara Gómez Seibane
Université de Castilla-La Mancha, Espagne
José Ramón Heredia
Université de Castilla-La Mancha, Espagne
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Madalina Lupu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Vasile Radulescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina-Madgalena Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Université « Spiru Haret », Bucarest, Roumanie
Numéro 6/2009
María Vicenta Hernández Álvarez  
Université de Salamanca, Espagne
Adriana Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Laura Badescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Adela Dumitrescu
Université « Constantin Brancoveanu » Pitesti, Roumanie
Yvonne Goga
Université « Babes-Bolyai » Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Pascal Rannou
Université de Paris 1- Panthéon-Sorbonne, France
Razvan Ventura
Roumanie
Liliana Voiculescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Universités de Sheffield & «Spiru Haret», Royaume Uni, Roumanie
Claude Muller
Université de Bordeaux, France
Corina-Amelia Georgescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
 
 Numéro 7/2010
Adriana Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Otilia-Carmen Cojan
Université "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", Iasi, Roumanie
Corina-Ameila Georgescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Anamaria Ghiban
Université "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", Iasi, Roumanie
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Vasile Radulescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Razvan Ventura
Roumanie
Liliana Voiculescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Narcis Zarnescu
Universités de Sheffield & «Spiru Haret», Royaume Uni, Roumanie
Carmen-Ecaterina Astirbei
Université "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", Iasi, Roumanie
Joseph Avodo Avodo
Institut des langues étrangères, Université de Bergen, Norvège
Racha El Khamissy
Université de Ain Chams, Le Caire, Egypte
 
Numéro 8/2010
Adriana Apostol
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Otilia-Carmen Cojan
Université "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", Iasi, Roumanie
Marco Longo
Université de Catane-Raguse, Italie
Diana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
María Vicenta Hernández Álvarez
Université de Salamanca, Espagne
Corina-Amelia Georgescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Sorina Dora Simion
Lycée "I. C. Bratianu", Pitesti, Roumanie
Yvonne Goga
Université « Babes-Bolyai » Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie             
José Ramón Heredia
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Espagne
Mirsini Tzanavari
Université de Macédoine, Thessalonique, Grèce
Florinela Serbanica
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Bianca Romaniuc-Boularand
Université Paris-Est, France
Narcis Zarnescu
Universités de Sheffield & «Spiru Haret», Royaume Uni, Roumanie
 
 
Numéro hors-série « Exotisme(s)/2010
Dorsaf Ben Essid
Université de Jendouba, Tunis
Yevgeny Medvedev
Université de Toronto, Canada
Dominique Lanni
Université de Malte, Malte
Jean Florent Romaric Gnayoro
Université de Cocody, Côte d'Ivoire
Monica Garoiu
Kenyon College, Etats Unis
Razvan Ventura
Roumanie
Riham El Khamissy
Université de Ain Chams, Le Caire, Egypte
Florence Lojacono
Université de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Espagne
Françoise Bombard
Académie de Dijon, France
Diana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Marie Legret
Université de Paris IV – Sorbonne, France


Numéro 9/2011
Yvonne Goga
Université « Babes-Bolyai » Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie
Waël Rabadi
Université Al-Albayt, Jordanie
Simona-Veronica Ferent
Université de Limoges, France
Anca Magurean
Université « Stefan cel Mare » de Suceava, Roumanie
Simon-Renaud Monsegu
Université Normale de Jilin, Chine
Monica Tilea
Université de Craiova, Roumanie
Razvan Ventura
Roumanie
Consuela Dobrescu
Université de Navarre, Espagne
Diana-Adriana Lefter
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Alexandrina Mustatea
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Crina-Magdalena Zarnescu
Université de Pitesti, Roumanie
Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni
ICAR, Université Lumière Lyon 2, France
Bianca Romaniuc-Boularand
Université Paris-Est, France
Lăcrămioara Cocîrlă
Université « Stefan cel Mare » de Suceava, Roumanie
Alexandra Sirghi
Université « Stefan cel Mare » de Suceava, Roumanie

 



 

Sumarul ultimului număr Sumarul ultimului număr

Nu există rezultate.

Nu au fost găsite articole

Caută Caută

Toate câmpurile



Autor



Titlu



Număr  
  Volum  
Pagină  
   
Toate câmpurile prea lungi
Câmpul autor este prea lung  
Titlul introdus este prea lung  
Câmpul volum este prea lung  
Câmpul volum este greşit  
Câmpul numărului este prea lung  
Câmpul număr este completat greşit  
Câmpul pagină este prea lung  
Câmpul pagină este greşit  

Despre Despre

FABULA
www.fabula.org
http://www.fabula.org/actualites/article39568.php
http://www.fabula.org/actualites/article39569.php
http://www.fabula.org/actualites/article34905.php
http://www.fabula.org/actualites/article41747.php

INDEX COPERNICUS
www.indexcopernicus.com
http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/karta.php?action=masterlist&id=4888

SCIPIO
http://www.scipio.ro/web/studii-si-cercetari-filologice.-seria-limbi-romanice

DIRECTORY OF OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS – DOAJ
www.doaj.org
http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&issn=18433979&genre=journal

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
www.loc.gov
http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/Title%20assignments--Open%20Access%20Journal%20Project.xls

MLA INTERNATIONAL LIST OF PERIODICALS
http://www.kansalliskirjasto.fi/attachments/5l4xoyz0b/5s4OwKz0d/Files/CurrentFile/Title_list_714_62_2010.pdf

GEORGETOWN LIBRARY
http://gulib.georgetown.edu/newjour/s/msg03706.html

STATE LIBRARY OF KANSAS
http://journalfinder.wtcox.com/kslib/list-e.asp?t=24491&ucrit=s&qparsed=%2D1&lastrec=1300&sortord=ASC&campo=&twild=3

SAN JOSE LIBRARIES
http://mill1.sjlibrary.org:90/search~S1?/tStudiis+et+literis./tstudiis+et+literis/-3%2C-1%2C0%2CB/frameset&FF=tstudii+si+cercetari+filologice+seria+limbi+romanice&1%2C1%2C


ALEPH
http://aleph.vkol.cz/F?func=find-c&ccl_term=sys=000074341&con_lng=eng&local_base=svk07

FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
http://e-resources.fcu.edu.tw:8080/1cate/?data=thin.transtech&category=&searchtype=browse&title=St&BM=az&SR=0&NR=50&lower=&upper=&pubid=&rft_val_fmt=package&provider=DOAJ&tableName=Records

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
http://hsl.med.nyu.edu/details/95396

YORK UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES
http://www.library.yorku.ca/e/search/atoz?q=S&pg=132

VUB BIBLIOTEEK UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS
http://biblio.vub.ac.be/vlink/EList.csp?Sort=alpha&trigger=S&Language=eng&DocumentType=Journal#1843-3979

KUN SHAN UNIVERSITY
http://muse.lib.ksu.edu.tw:8080/1cate/?data=thin.transtech&category=&searchtype=browse&title=S&BM=az&SR=200&NR=50&lower=&upper=&pubid=&rft_val_fmt=package&provider=DOAJ&tableName=Records&show.index.nav.titles=true&set.user.locale=zh_TW

CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
http://metasearch.lib.cycu.edu.tw:8080/1cate/?data=thin.transtech&category=&searchtype=browse&title=Studii&BM=az&SR=0&NR=50&lower=&upper=&pubid=&rft_val_fmt=&provider=&tableName=

MU LIBRARIES MISSOURI
http://mulibraries.missouri.edu/staff/catalogdept/eserials/eserialrpt20100424unresolvedpt3.htm

HESBURG UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME
http://findtext.library.nd.edu:8889/ndu_local?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ND_ejl_loc&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&svc_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:sch_svc&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=2670000000006453

CHARLES STUNT UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
http://aleph.unilinc.edu.au/unilinc/new_titles/csu_new_titles_week_18.html

BIRMINGHAM PUBLIC LIBRARY
http://www.bham.lib.al.us/virtual/databases/journals.aspx?q=STUDII+SI+CERCETARI+FILOLOGICE+SERIA+LIMBI+ROMANICE&t=0

NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY
http://journalfinder.wtcox.com/nccu/list-e.asp?t=36950&lastrec=100&subj=101&sortord=ASC&sortf=title%5Fdisp

BIBLIOTECA DEL UNIVERSITA DI ROMA TOR VERGATA
http://d-library.uniroma2.it/contents/periodici.aspx?let=s&subrange=sr-st

BIBLIOTECA DEL UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI MODENA E REGGIO EMILIA
http://riviste.sba.unimo.it/List_Title.asp?Provider=DOAJ&Provider_full=Directory%20of%20Open%20Access%20Journals



 

Contact Contact

Date contact ...

Anunţuri Anunţuri

Articole publicate în regim Online First Articole publicate în regim Online First

Nu există rezultate.

Nu au fost găsite articole